What is the difference between a court judge and justice?

A Judge presides over the lower courts like the district court in your area. A justice is a member of the supreme court which is the highest level of court. Justices are nominated by the executive branch and appointed by legislative branch.

Many people wonder about the designation of two officers that are authorized to administer specific legal actions in local, state, and federal jurisdictions. Those two officers are the judge and the justice. While the two terms are used interchangeably in many instances, there is often a difference between a justice and a judge. Some of the differences involve the background of the individual holding the title, the structure of the local jurisdiction, and the specific duties associated with each title.

In most parts of the world, a judge is an appointed official of the court that also happens to hold a degree in law. Judges tend to be associated with legal functions that have to do with the enforcement of the laws of the land. As such, a judge will preside at a legal proceeding, such as a criminal hearing or a civil court case. He or she will render a verdict based on the legal procedures and precedents currently in force in the jurisdiction, including the deliverance of sentences for prison terms if the situation merits this course of action.

In contrast, justices will perform a different function within the judicial system. Also sworn to uphold the laws of the land, a justice does not necessarily have to be an attorney or have any formal legal training. Instead, a justice will be empowered by the jurisdiction to perform such functions as the witnessing of legal documents, the performance of civil unions and marriages, and other similar duties as defined by the jurisdiction. In some parts of the world, local justice officials are elected rather than appointed.

Since legal systems vary from one country to the next, there are no clear-cut differences between a justice and a judge in some jurisdictions. Depending on the location and local laws, a justice may preside at a court of law and a judge may be empowered to perform legal unions. When discussing the differences between a judge and a justice, it is often helpful to define the jurisdiction under consideration, and look at the specific application of those two terms within that jurisdiction.

ttorneys, law clerks, and bailiffs all have their purpose in the court system, but the law is actually carried out when judges and justices issue their rulings on a case.

Judges and justices are court officials who make the final decision in every case that is brought to a court of law. Depending on the jurisdiction, they can sit on the bench anywhere between six to eight years. Judges and justices must retire at least by the age of 70.

Judges handle local cases
Judges work in lower level courts, such as district court and circuit court. In many states, judges are licensed attorneys who run for the public office of judge. These attorneys have successfully attended law school, passed the state’s bar examination, and have practiced law for at least five years. When a judge vacates a seat, the governor of that state appoints a replacement who will serve until the next judicial election.

In other states, judges are appointed by the governor who receives recommendations from a judicial nominating committee. Some states choose to appoint judges to avoid judicial candidates from having to raise money for their own election and risk being influenced by special interest groups.

Lower court judges preside over trials and hear oral arguments in civil cases and misdemeanor and felony criminal justice cases. Parties in those cases can appeal a judge’s decision to justices in higher courts.

Justices operate differently than judges
Justices are found on a state’s Appeals Court and Supreme Court. A higher court justice can either be elected or appointed. For instance, voters in the state of Michigan elect both appellate and Supreme Court justices. Judicial candidates must be nominated to the Supreme Court bench at either the state’s Republican Party convention, the Democratic Party convention, or by another party that has ballot status in the state of Michigan.

Conversely, in the state of Iowa, the governor appoints justices to the appeals court and the Supreme Court after considering nominees from the state’s Judicial Nominating Commission.

Unlike their counterparts in lower courts who work alone, appellate justices can consider cases in “panels,” meaning three justices can decide a case. A full court of justices may decide to join together to consider a more complex or prominent case.

Justices do not hold trials, but review documentation from the lower courts before making decisions. When necessary, justices will hear oral arguments from attorneys on specific cases, and will issue a written opinion at a later date. Lower court judges also issue written opinions, but there are times when they rule from the bench shortly after hearing oral arguments.

Although each state has different laws for placing justices and judges in place, it is important that these court officials render fair and equitable decisions to all parties that appear before the bench.