Grace
Is a Masters worth it for unlicensed Architects
Is getting a #Masters degree (in Historic Preservation) worth the time, money, and effort following an undergrad in #architecture if I don’t intend to pursue licensure? It’s my understanding that as an Architectural Designer, I may be taken more seriously with a Masters degree as well as the B.Arch than if I finished with the B.Arch alone. #graduate #graduate-school #architect
2 answers
Elisa Catanzarite
Elisa’s Answer
Hi Grace,
I would say that getting a Master's all depends on where your passions lie. If you are passionate about Historic Preservation, and are interested in studying it further then a Master's Degree could definitely be the right choice.
If you are concerned with not being taken seriously with your B.Arch I can assure you that your degree matters much less than your ability to collaborate and do the work asked of you. In reality school prepares you very little for the work that you will actually be doing when you join a firm, and a large part of learning the practice of architecture happens on the job. A student fresh from undergrad will likely be doing the same exact tasks that a student fresh from a graduate program will be doing. I am working at an architecture firm under a licensed architect and did not study architecture in school. I started out doing the same tasks as someone fresh from architecture school. My degree did not matter in the slightest.
As far as licensure goes you do not need a master's degree to get licensed. In some jurisdictions you don't even need a degree in architecture. You can always make the decision to pursue licensure later in your career if you wanted to with or with out a Master's. Check out NCARB's website for more information on the different paths to licensure to get a better understanding of what would be required.
Elisa recommends the following next steps:
Luke Durkin, NCARB, AIA
Luke’s Answer
My recommendation would be to either test the waters a little bit, see what kind of job you can get first. Second would be to get in touch with some firms that do historic preservation work and see how much they would value that in an applicant.
Generally from architecture firms, I hear them say that it's more about the candidate and their personality and soft skills than there credentials.
The other thing to factor in here is the job market. In the good job market, we've been in the last 5 years, it's so easy to get a job, there has been a massive undersupply of candidates especially in the 3-5yr exp range. So if you're in the 0-1 or 1-3yr range you could very easily get a job and a good one without a higher degree or other credentials. Even in a bad job market, once you get past that 3yr mark, it'll be much less about your degree and much more about your experience and your soft skills, personality and so forth. If you have done studio work in your B.Arch or done your senior project on historic preservation, that'll likely be enough. That senior project will set you above most applicants.
It's hard to say what it will be like in 1-2 years, but; from what I'm seeing architecture has not been impacted much right now but if government funding, especially state and local, is the source of a lot of historic work; I think historic preservation could take a hit as state and local government tax revenue will take a hit. Further, things like affordable housing will likely take precedent in funding over historic preservation so that could exacerbate the lack of funding.
I assume if you're considering this you've looked into historical preservation and have perhaps interned in it. One of the downfalls of a specialty degree is that it won't help you much outside of that specialty so I'd really make sure you love historical preservation and want to do it for the long term. From my limited experience historical preservation is a lot of reading, very drawn out processes, very tedious. For example, a lot of time is spent on determining which solvent to use when cleaning each material. That is a lot of what historic preservation is I believe. But I would think it'd be really cool to get a job with the National Park Service. It can be really rewarding to work on high profile projects. If you like doing library research it could be really fun. You get to do a lot of things most architects don't get to spend a lot of time on. But also look to see how common it is for the architects to do these things vs hiring consultants such as historians. If you like doing city council meetings and things like that I imagine there is more of that too.
One thing I can tell you from experience is that renovations can be a pain (vs new construction) the code research is a lot more complex and the project doesn't often fall inside the box that is the code. Renovations often also mean fitting things like sprinklers, Mech, Elec, Plumbing, fire escapes into buildings which they weren't designed to accommodate. Dealing with hazardous materials. (Usually, architects aren't involved in that too much).
I hope that helps!
Your answer gives me a lot to think about, and I'm glad that you were able to acknowledge the drawbacks of a specification in niche work like historic preservation.. thank you so much for your thoughtful response!
Grace
great, I'm glad you appreciated it. I don't want to overemphasize the drawbacks though; I think for each drawback there is an equal and opposite positive. Possibly with a skew one way or the other based on the job market. Having something to set you apart from the pack is always helpful too.
Luke Durkin, NCARB, AIA